elaine, 26, film student always, and the last to leave the theatre.

Photobucket

June 9th
22:45
This film is about growing up, life, love and friendship, and one of the concerns that’s expressed by both sexes is about being “undateable.”  Do you think that’s a genuine fear of a lot of men and women?
GRETA GERWIG:  For Frances, it was a point of pride at one point that she was undateable.  This feeling that she didn’t fit into hetero-normative structures, that she wasn’t able to settle down, and no man would be able to handle her.  She thought that she and her friend were like that and that they would grow old together and be spinsters or something.  As the movie goes on, she realizes that she doesn’t want to be left out of that aspect of life.  I don’t think she becomes worried about it so much as there’s just a moment where she sees a man, Benji (Michael Zegen), who she could have probably dated, with another girl, and she thinks, “Everybody is moving on and coupling off and doing these things, and I haven’t done it and maybe that was the wrong choice.”  For her, it’s more about that. (via)

This film is about growing up, life, love and friendship, and one of the concerns that’s expressed by both sexes is about being “undateable.”  Do you think that’s a genuine fear of a lot of men and women?

GRETA GERWIG:  For Frances, it was a point of pride at one point that she was undateable.  This feeling that she didn’t fit into hetero-normative structures, that she wasn’t able to settle down, and no man would be able to handle her.  She thought that she and her friend were like that and that they would grow old together and be spinsters or something.  As the movie goes on, she realizes that she doesn’t want to be left out of that aspect of life.  I don’t think she becomes worried about it so much as there’s just a moment where she sees a man, Benji (Michael Zegen), who she could have probably dated, with another girl, and she thinks, “Everybody is moving on and coupling off and doing these things, and I haven’t done it and maybe that was the wrong choice.”  For her, it’s more about that. (via)

June 8th
12:57

What initially attracted you to the character of Richard Harrow and how much of his mannerisms did you create?



Jack Huston: It was probably the best character that I had ever read. It was simply written: a man with an affliction on half his face who wears a tin mask to cover it. It was written with a lot of what we in Britain call “full stops” or what you would call periods in the middle of sentences at weird moments. “My name, period, is Richard Harrow,” which I interpreted as Richard having trouble speaking. I was in London, putting myself on film for the audition. I put some cotton wool in my mouth and came up with a voice when I was on a train with my brother. I imagined this voice because his face was injured, so his throat could have been injured as well. Everything was in [that audition tape]: the clicks, the slurping. I thought, if he had an affliction over half his face, maybe he was missing part of his mouth. I imagined the pain and suffering that someone like that would go through.



What are the challenges involved in the physicality of acting with only half of your face?



Huston: I think you have to emote a lot more. As an actor, your eyes are probably your most important asset. You can almost read any emotion through someone’s eyes. Having one eye, that eye has to do double time. He’s written so well and it comes so naturally: the pain and the anguish, they’re so deep-rooted inside of me now. I feel like when I put that mask on, I transform. (via)

What initially attracted you to the character of Richard Harrow and how much of his mannerisms did you create?

Jack Huston: It was probably the best character that I had ever read. It was simply written: a man with an affliction on half his face who wears a tin mask to cover it. It was written with a lot of what we in Britain call “full stops” or what you would call periods in the middle of sentences at weird moments. “My name, period, is Richard Harrow,” which I interpreted as Richard having trouble speaking. I was in London, putting myself on film for the audition. I put some cotton wool in my mouth and came up with a voice when I was on a train with my brother. I imagined this voice because his face was injured, so his throat could have been injured as well. Everything was in [that audition tape]: the clicks, the slurping. I thought, if he had an affliction over half his face, maybe he was missing part of his mouth. I imagined the pain and suffering that someone like that would go through.

What are the challenges involved in the physicality of acting with only half of your face?

Huston: I think you have to emote a lot more. As an actor, your eyes are probably your most important asset. You can almost read any emotion through someone’s eyes. Having one eye, that eye has to do double time. He’s written so well and it comes so naturally: the pain and the anguish, they’re so deep-rooted inside of me now. I feel like when I put that mask on, I transform. (via)

June 7th
16:03
Via

brain-food:

Chris Pine for OUT Magazine June/July 2013

On why Kirk needs Spock: The relationship [with Spock] is the core of what Kirk goes through. It’s substantial, and the arc and the trajectory of his journey is huge, almost Greek. But you can’t talk about Kirk without talking about Spock, and it’s through his relationship with Spock that he learns the greatest lessons, about loving someone to the point of being able to do away with all rules and regulations and the constraints in order to save, protect and do justice to your friend.

On his first time playing gay: My first intimate scene [onscreen] was with Tom Everett Scott,” Pine says, referring to his role in the TV movie-of-the-week, Surrender, Dorothy, with Diane Keaton, in which he plays gay. “He’s an incredible spooner — very warm, very sensitive.”

How his four-year English degree from Berkley contributed to a kind of critical speed-read technique: “I think I’ve read 20 scripts in the last two and a half weeks. Those tools are indispensable, all those little micro-muscles in your brain that are just trained to see certain things. All you do all day is read, break down story, structure, character, and technique.”

On costar Zachary Quinto’s sexuality and coming out: It was something that I knew about Zach from the moment I met him. It was just who Zach was and that’s that. I’m sensitive, and I don’t ever want to make anyone feel uncomfortable. Knowing that for Zach it was more about a career thing and that he was not comfortable at the time coming out — it was fine. It was something that we kind of tiptoed around and I just took it as a given, because that’s what he wanted.” But when Quinto came out in 2011 in an interview with New York magazine, Pine was thrilled: “So happy for him, oh man. I thought it was rad. It was really, really cool. He did it on his own time, on his own schedule. And Jonathan [Groff], who he’s dating, is such a lovely man. He’s a good guy and a great actor, and they make a fantastic couple. I couldn’t have been happier for Zach.”

He’d like to see a gay action star: “All it really takes is the fact that the man isn’t going home to his wife, but has a boyfriend at home,” he says. “I think it would be a wonderful thing to see.”

I actually picked up this copy of OUT Magazine because Chris Pine gave such an excellent interview. 

June 4th
15:36
So much of this film plays without dialogue and instead makes use of a lot of music.  How did that aesthetic happen?
SODERBERGH:  A lot of people that make movies forget that a movie should work with the sound off.  You should be able to watch a movie without the sound and understand what’s going on.  Your job is to build a series of chronological images that tell the story.  I’m frustrated when I see movies in which I feel like the plot is being told to me, instead of being shown to me.  I also like to stage scenes in which you see a lot of people in the frame at once, so physicality becomes a really important part of that aesthetic.  I need actors who understand how to use their bodies ‘cause the shot is going to be up there for awhile and you’re going to see them, if not full length, probably down to the thigh, so all of that stuff becomes really important.  Sometimes I’m choreographing moves with the camera, with moves that they’re doing.  Their sense of having to dance a little bit with the camera needs to be pretty pronounced.  In this case, everybody fell into that very quickly and understood what I was trying to do.
What was the process of preparation like for this?
SODERBERGH:  I can tell you that this cast was so disciplined.  They ate like rabbits.  It was lettuce with lemon juice on it.  Honestly, I’ve worked on movies with a lot of women who look great and take care of themselves, but I’ve never seen this kind of diligence.  Maybe it was just fear.  But, I didn’t sense any competition because the fear of doing it bonded them really quickly.  They were all jumping out of the plane together.  As soon as I saw the routines for the first time, I knew we were going to be fine because they were funny.  They weren’t dirty, they were fun.
Did you have a process for choosing the thongs for each character?
SODERBERGH:  As you can imagine, it was a very personal process.  I know what I like, so it didn’t take long, at all.  When you go in the thong shop, you do have to make decisions about which ones you’re going to pick, but it’s pretty easy to eliminate 99% of what’s hanging on these racks ‘cause they’re just silly or ugly.  I think we were trying to find this balance.  There’s a very dark version of this movie to be made, but at the end of the day, we wanted this to be fun.  Whether it was the costumes or the routines or just the way that people were interacting with each other, we wanted to find this line where you were smiling, as opposed to being disgusted.  We were constantly surfing that.
This is a movie about entertainers caught in the struggle between art and commerce.  How deliberate was that theme and how much would you like the audience to think about that?
SODERBERGH:  I wanted to make sure that there were a lot of conversations in the movie about money and work because I feel like, for most people, these are issues that dominate their lives, especially lately.  We were always looking for ways to bring that conversation into the film.  The most obvious example is when Chan goes to the bank to try to get a loan.  I think this issue of what you’re willing to do to be paid is interesting.  At a certain point, Mike starts to feel that what he’s doing is undervalued and he has to make a decision about whether he can accept that, and I think everybody has been in a situation where they have felt undervalued, at a certain point, and they have to make a decision about how they’re going to express that or whether they’re going to express it.  I think it’s a very relatable issue.
There are a lot of dance montages in the movie.  Will the full numbers be on the DVD?
SODERBERGH:  We have edited together the full-length versions of all the routines.  Honestly, they’re that pretty disturbing!  We sent them all to Sue Kroll at Warner Bros. and she said, “I really like these a lot!”  I think it’s not for men.  It made me really uncomfortable to watch them.  We did 10 or 12, and to watch them all, back-to-back, was really disturbing. (via Collider)

So much of this film plays without dialogue and instead makes use of a lot of music.  How did that aesthetic happen?

SODERBERGH:  A lot of people that make movies forget that a movie should work with the sound off.  You should be able to watch a movie without the sound and understand what’s going on.  Your job is to build a series of chronological images that tell the story.  I’m frustrated when I see movies in which I feel like the plot is being told to me, instead of being shown to me.  I also like to stage scenes in which you see a lot of people in the frame at once, so physicality becomes a really important part of that aesthetic.  I need actors who understand how to use their bodies ‘cause the shot is going to be up there for awhile and you’re going to see them, if not full length, probably down to the thigh, so all of that stuff becomes really important.  Sometimes I’m choreographing moves with the camera, with moves that they’re doing.  Their sense of having to dance a little bit with the camera needs to be pretty pronounced.  In this case, everybody fell into that very quickly and understood what I was trying to do.


What was the process of preparation like for this?

SODERBERGH:  I can tell you that this cast was so disciplined.  They ate like rabbits.  It was lettuce with lemon juice on it.  Honestly, I’ve worked on movies with a lot of women who look great and take care of themselves, but I’ve never seen this kind of diligence.  Maybe it was just fear.  But, I didn’t sense any competition because the fear of doing it bonded them really quickly.  They were all jumping out of the plane together.  As soon as I saw the routines for the first time, I knew we were going to be fine because they were funny.  They weren’t dirty, they were fun.

Did you have a process for choosing the thongs for each character?

SODERBERGH:  As you can imagine, it was a very personal process.  I know what I like, so it didn’t take long, at all.  When you go in the thong shop, you do have to make decisions about which ones you’re going to pick, but it’s pretty easy to eliminate 99% of what’s hanging on these racks ‘cause they’re just silly or ugly.  I think we were trying to find this balance.  There’s a very dark version of this movie to be made, but at the end of the day, we wanted this to be fun.  Whether it was the costumes or the routines or just the way that people were interacting with each other, we wanted to find this line where you were smiling, as opposed to being disgusted.  We were constantly surfing that.

This is a movie about entertainers caught in the struggle between art and commerce.  How deliberate was that theme and how much would you like the audience to think about that?

SODERBERGH:  I wanted to make sure that there were a lot of conversations in the movie about money and work because I feel like, for most people, these are issues that dominate their lives, especially lately.  We were always looking for ways to bring that conversation into the film.  The most obvious example is when Chan goes to the bank to try to get a loan.  I think this issue of what you’re willing to do to be paid is interesting.  At a certain point, Mike starts to feel that what he’s doing is undervalued and he has to make a decision about whether he can accept that, and I think everybody has been in a situation where they have felt undervalued, at a certain point, and they have to make a decision about how they’re going to express that or whether they’re going to express it.  I think it’s a very relatable issue.

There are a lot of dance montages in the movie.  Will the full numbers be on the DVD?

SODERBERGH:  We have edited together the full-length versions of all the routines.  Honestly, they’re that pretty disturbing!  We sent them all to Sue Kroll at Warner Bros. and she said, “I really like these a lot!”  I think it’s not for men.  It made me really uncomfortable to watch them.  We did 10 or 12, and to watch them all, back-to-back, was really disturbing. (via Collider)

10:25
Via
"[…] That’s the fun part about working with Joss, we never tell a story just for the sake of telling it, there’s always something more interesting at play and he is just unafraid to say “Okay, but now that we know what the core is, let’s have fun” and that’s the secret. I mean really just finding a strong core to the story and then once that’s happening, don’t worry about it. We don’t have to beat everyone over the head, just have a good time."
—  Drew Goddard, on writing and working with Joss Whedon on The Cabin in the Woods (2012) (source)
May 20th
23:12
Via

walkamongstthestars:

S: The thing is, the Benedict everyone sees is a little different to the Benedict we know[…] so the Benedict that all the girls love and stuff, it’s- it’s a myth.

[x]

May 15th
21:04
Via
17272dorsetave:


Indiewire: Your work has always managed to showcase these characters with amazing eccentricities — like, in the case of Nina Conti’s character, speaking your mind uncontrollably by way of a monkey puppet — but the humor never seems to come at the expense of these characters, it’s not cruel. How do you find the comedy without hanging them out to dry?
Christopher Guest: I think it’s important for what I do — I can’t speak to other people — to have as much weight on the emotional investment the people will have in the characters. Even though there’s this woman with this puppet who’s had this traumatic experience, it should be that you care about her even though it’s kind of bizarre.
When I did “Best in Show,” Eugene Levy had two left feet, and you think, wow, that’s kind of… But I think people really related to him — he was this poor guy, this guy who was really having some problems. It’s very easy to dump on characters, to make people look stupid. That’s a very short-lived thing, it’s a sketch, then it’s over and who cares.
For me, having the investment of two years of working on a film, it’s important that there’s another dimension and it’s usually about feeling something for those people even if they’re deluded. You have to feel something for them, it makes it more interesting and maybe it makes it funnier.

Read The Full Interview

17272dorsetave:

Indiewire: Your work has always managed to showcase these characters with amazing eccentricities — like, in the case of Nina Conti’s character, speaking your mind uncontrollably by way of a monkey puppet — but the humor never seems to come at the expense of these characters, it’s not cruel. How do you find the comedy without hanging them out to dry?

Christopher Guest: I think it’s important for what I do — I can’t speak to other people — to have as much weight on the emotional investment the people will have in the characters. Even though there’s this woman with this puppet who’s had this traumatic experience, it should be that you care about her even though it’s kind of bizarre.

When I did “Best in Show,” Eugene Levy had two left feet, and you think, wow, that’s kind of… But I think people really related to him — he was this poor guy, this guy who was really having some problems. It’s very easy to dump on characters, to make people look stupid. That’s a very short-lived thing, it’s a sketch, then it’s over and who cares.

For me, having the investment of two years of working on a film, it’s important that there’s another dimension and it’s usually about feeling something for those people even if they’re deluded. You have to feel something for them, it makes it more interesting and maybe it makes it funnier.

Read The Full Interview

May 7th
16:55
Via
"But in cinematography, forget DSLRs, forget film, forget everything – it’s all about lighting and exposure. That separates the talented people from the untalented in storytelling. If you know how to light, you know how to expose."
13:05
Via

“Sometimes when you write something on the page, it can seem very funny, but when you act it out—and this happens to me a lot, actually—the melancholy of the situation becomes more front and center. I think it is a much more emotional show than a satirical romp. In the end, it’s kind of a mini-drama. There are a lot of comedic moments, but they’re not always laugh-out-loud funny.” - Mike White, writer/actor/producer for Enlightened

April 17th
18:43
Via
magpieandwhale:

Stay excellent, Emma Thompson:

If you could meet any writer, dead or alive, who would it be? What would you want to know? 
I wasn’t sure how to answer this one so I discussed it with my 12-year-old daughter. She suggested Plato. I was impressed. So Plato it is. I think I’d want to ask him how he’d imagine life had changed by 2012. 
Have you ever written to an author? Did he or she write back? 
I wrote to René Goscinny when I was 7 or 8, a fan letter about Asterix. He wrote back, saying that he was very proud to have made a little English girl laugh.
You’re organizing a literary dinner party and inviting three writers. Who’s on the list? 
Sappho, for a bit of ancient gender politics; Aphra Behn for theater gossip; and George Eliot because everyone who knew her said she was fascinating. All women, because they know how to get talking about the nitty-gritty so quickly and are less prone to telling anecdotes. I’d have gone for Jane Austen if I weren’t convinced she’d just have a soft-boiled egg and leave early.        

Definitely click through to see what books she’s got on her nightstand.

magpieandwhale:

Stay excellent, Emma Thompson:

If you could meet any writer, dead or alive, who would it be? What would you want to know? 

I wasn’t sure how to answer this one so I discussed it with my 12-year-old daughter. She suggested Plato. I was impressed. So Plato it is. I think I’d want to ask him how he’d imagine life had changed by 2012. 

Have you ever written to an author? Did he or she write back? 

I wrote to René Goscinny when I was 7 or 8, a fan letter about Asterix. He wrote back, saying that he was very proud to have made a little English girl laugh.

You’re organizing a literary dinner party and inviting three writers. Who’s on the list? 

Sappho, for a bit of ancient gender politics; Aphra Behn for theater gossip; and George Eliot because everyone who knew her said she was fascinating. All women, because they know how to get talking about the nitty-gritty so quickly and are less prone to telling anecdotes. I’d have gone for Jane Austen if I weren’t convinced she’d just have a soft-boiled egg and leave early.        

Definitely click through to see what books she’s got on her nightstand.

March 12th
21:45
Via
February 20th
10:20
Via
"

I just think it’s sad that the main places in our culture that we designate to meet new people are bars and nightclubs. I have not had great luck in those spots. I think you’re better off going through mutual friends. The other thing is work and school. Those are the best, I think, because you have repeated, unplanned, in-person interactions where you can really get to know people.

I’m so jealous of people who have crushes on people they go to school with, or work with. That’s such a blessing. You actually get to see them all the time and spend time with them. Most single people I know, myself included, have a difficult time even meeting up with the people they like, be it busy schedules, texting games, or whatever.

The school/work thing is huge, because you don’t have to deal with that. You are automatically given the three factors sociologists have always said you need to build a meaningful connection with someone: 1) proximity, 2) unplanned interactions, and 3) a setting that encourages people to let their guard down and confide in each other. I read about this concept in another depressing article about how you probably won’t make new strong friendships after 30.

"